![]() |
Image: Rijksmuseum, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons |
The underlying issue which interests me as an historian is around the bounding of the state. What is the role of local and national government? Which services are hard public goods, and which are soft ones? How are services to be funded? And how is public conceptualized?
The most useful moments of visibility in this have, for me, been at times of reform. My MA dissertation considered this in terms of the reform of one notoriously corrupt borough, ‘The languages of common good: municipal reform, urban governance, and charity administration, Leicester c.1820- c.1850’. A shorter version appeared as an article in Midland History.
My thesis, ‘The Common Good and the reform of local government in Edinburgh 1820-56’ was concerned with similar questions. In Scotland, the ancient patrimony of a Royal Burgh is known as the Common Good, which had special legal status, and whilst it could fund much municipal action, yet against the public health and other challenges of the rapidly growing and industrializing nineteenth-century city, provided only scant relief. Extensive borrowing against the security of its future income led to disaster for Aberdeen and Edinburgh. I am working on converting my thesis to a monograph.
Comments
Post a Comment